In a statement signed by the group’s Project Coordinator, Hon. Muttaka Ahmed Ibrahim,  acknowledged the strong reactions trailing the case, particularly from civil society organisations critical of the senator’s six-month suspension by the Senate. While the court upheld the Senate’s constitutional powers to discipline its members, it described the suspension as “excessive.”

The court, however, ruled against Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan, ordering her to publish a formal apology in two national newspapers and on her Facebook page within seven days. In addition, the lawmaker was fined ₦5 million for contempt in a civil proceeding, a move the ARP says underscores the importance of adhering to judicial processes.

ARP cautioned against ongoing efforts by some civil society groups to mobilize mass protests in response to the ruling.

“While civic action is vital in any democracy, reactionary protests at this point risk inciting unrest and may weaken the very institutions we seek to strengthen,” the statement warned.

Reaffirming its commitment to peace, justice, and national unity, the Arewa Revival Project urged youth-led and Northern-based organisations to redirect their energies toward constructive civic education and lawful advocacy that support institutional reform and national development.

The post Group Reacts to Court Verdict on Sen. Natasha, Urges Calm and Respect for Institutions appeared first on Daily Dates Nigeria.

Describing the accusation as a “complete fabrication,” Akpabio insisted there was no basis for such a serious allegation and urged the public to disregard it.

The controversy erupted earlier this week when Senator Natasha, representing Kogi Central, alleged during her interaction with her constituency that there was a coordinated attempt on her life, which she linked to political tensions within the National Assembly. She claimed to have received intelligence indicating threats connected to her outspoken stance on certain legislative matters.

Akpabio through his media aide, Eseme Eyibo, described the accusation as malicious and false. Akpabio categorically denied any involvement or knowledge of such a plot, stating that:

“At no time was there any meeting, discussion, or intention by myself or any member of the Senate leadership to harm Senator Natasha or any other senator. Her claims are not only unfounded but dangerous, and they serve only to inflame political tension unnecessarily.”

Akpabio also expressed concern that such claims could undermine the integrity of the Senate and the democratic process, calling on security agencies to investigate thoroughly and ensure the safety of all lawmakers.

“This pattern of deliberate falsehoods and manipulative theatrics reveals a troubling willingness to exploit public sensitivities through recurring victimhood narratives. It is a matter of public record that she has previously made assassination allegations against former Governor Yaya Bello and others in 2019 and 2023, along with multiple unsubstantiated claims of sexual harassment against other dignitaries. Her recurring persecution narrative and evident lying complex should not be weaponized to malign individuals or destroy hard-earned reputations”, he added.

The Senate President added that rather than indulge in baseless accusations, members of the National Assembly should focus on the pressing task of lawmaking and governance for the benefit of Nigerians.

The post Akpabio Denies Senator Natasha’s Assassination Claim appeared first on Daily Dates Nigeria.

In a landmark ruling on Friday, the court affirmed that the recall process is constitutionally valid and aligns with the civic rights of Kogi Central Senatorial District constituents. It also urged the petitioners to exercise their rights in a peaceful and orderly manner.

This decision follows the court’s interim injunction on Thursday, which temporarily restrained INEC from receiving, accepting, or acting on any recall petition or conducting a referendum regarding Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan’s removal.

The injunction was granted after an ex-parte application was filed by Anebe Jacob Ogirima and four others, all registered voters in Kogi Central. Their counsel, Smart Nwachimere, argued that the recall petition contained fictitious signatures.

While the court has now permitted the recall process to proceed, INEC remains barred from accepting petitions with fake signatures or conducting a referendum based on such fraudulent documents.

The case has been adjourned to May 6, 2025, for further proceedings.

The post Courts Says Natasha’s Recall from the Senate is a “Civil Right” appeared first on Daily Dates Nigeria.